
SCOTUS to Hear Chicago Gun Ban CaseWASHINGTON, D.C. The U.S. Supreme Court announced recently that it will hear the case of McDonald v. City of Chicago
At issue is a 27-year-old Chicago law banning handguns, requiring the annual taxation of firearms, and otherwise interfering
with the right of law-abiding individuals to keep guns at home for self-defense. The case was brought on behalf of four Chicago residents, the Second Amendment Foundation, and the Illinois State Rifle Association.
Last year, in the landmark case of
District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms.
![[description]](http://net.fwpublications.com/newsletters/Images/Newsletters/GunBroker_-_2009_10_12_2009/scotuse.jpg)
However, as that case concerned the actions of the District of Columbia government, a federal entity, the high court
was not called upon to decide whether the right bound states and local governments. Over the years, almost the entire Bill of Rights has been held to apply to state and local governments by operation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The freedoms we enjoy
as Americans are secured to us against violation by all levels of government," noted Alan Gura, of Gura & Possessky, PLLC, lead counsel for the McDonald plaintiffs. "State and local politicians should be on notice: the Second Amendment is a normal part
of the Bill of Rights, and it is coming to your town."
Otis McDonald, a Chicago resident since 1952 who led the fight to integrate his union local in the 1960s and is a plaintiff in the case, welcomed the news.
"I am grateful the Supreme Court
has agreed to hear this case," McDonald said. "I now pray that the Court secures me and all other law-abiding citizens the right to defend ourselves and our families."